|
Post by Icon Lord Leon Corbin on Jan 2, 2011 18:12:14 GMT -6
I was playing around. I am not happy with this but if we are going to have new banner then people should have input as to how they think it should be. Feel free to make suggestions and I will have go when I am not tired like right now lol.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Cairns on Jan 2, 2011 18:41:20 GMT -6
I like it. I think only two things you could try:
1) Maybe instead of the flaming background, try a nice, solid coloured lighter red for the background. Almost a pink. But with those white blurs still there around the text - I like those.
2)
|
|
|
Post by Icon Lord Leon Corbin on Jan 3, 2011 2:10:19 GMT -6
How about this?
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Cairns on Jan 3, 2011 4:12:24 GMT -6
Dat's cool! What about taking the transparency away from the 'Crimson?'
I have no idea why I wrote a 2) then left it blank.
|
|
|
Post by Head Booker on Jan 3, 2011 10:15:34 GMT -6
I don't like the GZG...GZW2K1 instead would work...
Tate
|
|
|
Post by Icon Lord Leon Corbin on Jan 3, 2011 11:49:05 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Cairns on Jan 3, 2011 12:43:24 GMT -6
What about flipping the background around so the whitey/pink in the top right corner is behind the GZW2K1 text, making it more easy to read. lol... we're pains.
|
|
|
Post by Icon Lord Leon Corbin on Jan 3, 2011 12:55:32 GMT -6
You're not kidding lol.
I'll give it a go when I am back in front of the com. Am I being smited for my failed attempts?
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Cairns on Jan 3, 2011 13:08:47 GMT -6
No lol. I just thought we were still in the input stage.
|
|
|
Post by Icon Lord Leon Corbin on Jan 3, 2011 15:02:25 GMT -6
I went too far to go back so I could change it over. I changed the colour of the GZW text instead. Yay or nay?
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Cairns on Jan 3, 2011 18:58:58 GMT -6
What about increasing or decreasing the image size by a single pixel? Could be a difference maker. Be sure to post both versions.
|
|
|
Post by Icon Lord Leon Corbin on Jan 3, 2011 19:49:58 GMT -6
|
|